Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] FC2 guest is working slower than RH9 on FC2 host

2005-08-02 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:26, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > I have tried itstill feel slower than RH 9I've tried > HPET=disable too with no luck. I'll try to investigate this issue > deeper but still welcome everyone's ideas Following up my own earlier posting today, I have discovered the re

Re: [Qemu-devel] FC2 guest is working slower than RH9 on FC2 host

2005-08-01 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hello Hetz, Ozan... > Add: clock=pit > to the fedora core GRUB kernel boot parameters . I have tried itstill feel slower than RH 9I've tried HPET=disable too with no luck. I'll try to investigate this issue deeper but still welcome everyone's ideas To Ozan: i use -m 256. do I need

Re: [Qemu-devel] FC2 guest is working slower than RH9 on FC2 host

2005-07-31 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Add: clock=pit to the fedora core GRUB kernel boot parameters . Hetz On 7/31/05, Mulyadi Santosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everybody > > Yesterday I tried to install Fedora Core 2 guest using qemu 0.7.1 (no > kqemu) on top of FC 2 host. Both guest and host are running 2.6.5-1.358 > (the

Re: [Qemu-devel] FC2 guest is working slower than RH9 on FC2 host

2005-07-31 Thread Ozan Türkyılmaz
On 31/07/05, Mulyadi Santosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everybody > > Yesterday I tried to install Fedora Core 2 guest using qemu 0.7.1 (no > kqemu) on top of FC 2 host. Both guest and host are running 2.6.5-1.358 > (the default kernel of FC2). I experienced slower boot speed and slower >

[Qemu-devel] FC2 guest is working slower than RH9 on FC2 host

2005-07-31 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hello everybody Yesterday I tried to install Fedora Core 2 guest using qemu 0.7.1 (no kqemu) on top of FC 2 host. Both guest and host are running 2.6.5-1.358 (the default kernel of FC2). I experienced slower boot speed and slower keyboard typing (the delay between a key a pressed and the actual