Alberto Garcia writes:
> On Mon 28 Jan 2019 07:38:08 PM CET, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>>> 093 submits several I/O requests using aio_read and aio_write with
>>> hmp_qemu_io(), then advances the clock using clock_step and finally
>>> calls query-blockstats to see how much of the I/O has been com
On Mon 28 Jan 2019 07:38:08 PM CET, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> 093 submits several I/O requests using aio_read and aio_write with
>> hmp_qemu_io(), then advances the clock using clock_step and finally
>> calls query-blockstats to see how much of the I/O has been completed
>> (it's an I/O throttli
Alberto Garcia writes:
> On Thu 24 Jan 2019 07:07:47 PM CET, Eric Blake wrote:
> 093 and 136 seem really flaky to me. I can reproduce that by
> running:
That's interesting, I can make 093 fail quite easily now (I haven't
tested the other one yet), but I don't think this ha
On Thu 24 Jan 2019 07:07:47 PM CET, Eric Blake wrote:
093 and 136 seem really flaky to me. I can reproduce that by
running:
>>>
>>> That's interesting, I can make 093 fail quite easily now (I haven't
>>> tested the other one yet), but I don't think this happened
>>> earlier. I'll try to
On 1/24/19 8:34 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Thu 24 Jan 2019 11:11:06 AM CET, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> On Wed 23 Jan 2019 06:00:49 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 093 and 136 seem really flaky to me. I can reproduce that by running:
>>
>> That's interesting, I can make 093 fail quite ea
On Thu 24 Jan 2019 11:11:06 AM CET, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Wed 23 Jan 2019 06:00:49 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 093 and 136 seem really flaky to me. I can reproduce that by running:
>
> That's interesting, I can make 093 fail quite easily now (I haven't
> tested the other one yet), b
On Wed 23 Jan 2019 06:00:49 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 093 and 136 seem really flaky to me. I can reproduce that by running:
That's interesting, I can make 093 fail quite easily now (I haven't
tested the other one yet), but I don't think this happened earlier. I'll
try to figure out what'
Hi,
093 and 136 seem really flaky to me. I can reproduce that by running:
$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null
in as many shells as I have CPU cores, and then run the tests:
$ while TEST_DIR=/tmp/t0 ./check -T -raw 93; do; done
or
$ while TEST_DIR=/tmp/t0 ./check -T -raw 136; do; done
which us
