> "Peter" == Peter Crosthwaite writes:
Peter> So ptimer has safeguards against misuse in periodic mode but
Peter> not one-shot mode? This strikes me as inconsistent. I.E. for
Peter> one use case the safeguard is in ptimer, and the other in the
Peter> client device. I think if we are in the bu
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> "Paolo" == Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
> Paolo> Il 14/06/2012 04:29, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>>> Obviously this sucks as a patch, but without this hack, the system
>>> freezes on boot. I managed to ascertain that its coming from the
>>>
> "Paolo" == Paolo Bonzini writes:
Paolo> Il 14/06/2012 04:29, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>> Obviously this sucks as a patch, but without this hack, the system
>> freezes on boot. I managed to ascertain that its coming from the
>> ptimer used by the system timer (hw/xilinx_timer.c). The CP
Il 14/06/2012 04:29, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
> Obviously this sucks as a patch, but without this hack, the system
> freezes on boot. I managed to ascertain that its coming from the
> ptimer used by the system timer (hw/xilinx_timer.c). The CPU is either
> halted and never resumes, or the time
Hi all,
For a while now I have had this hack in my tree:
Author: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite
Date: Fri Mar 30 15:04:05 2012 +1000
async.c: disabled event notifications.
This is a nasty hack thats needed to prevent the xilinx timer from
deadlocking
Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwa
