On 05/18/2012 08:08 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/06/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
So what's really the use case here? Would an IPMI -> libvirt bridge get you
what you need? I really
On 05/18/2012 08:08 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/06/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
So what's really the use case here? Would an IPMI -> libvirt bridge get you
what you need? I really
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/06/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> So what's really the use case here? Would an IPMI -> libvirt bridge get you
> what you need? I really think that's the best path forward.
I'm
FWIW, the idea of an IPMI interface to VMs was proposed for libvirt
not too long ago. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815136
Dave
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:07:45PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> I think we are getting a little out of hand here, and we are mixing
> up concepts :
On 05/07/2012 01:07 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
I think we are getting a little out of hand here, and we are mixing up concepts
:).
There are lots of things IPMI *can* do (including serial access, VGA snooping,
LAN access, etc.) but I don't see any value it that. The main thing here is to
emulate
On 05/07/2012 02:45 PM, Dave Allan wrote:
FWIW, the idea of an IPMI interface to VMs was proposed for libvirt
not too long ago. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815136
Well, it wouldn't be to hard to do. I already have working emulation
code that does the IPMI LAN interface
I think we are getting a little out of hand here, and we are mixing up
concepts :).
There are lots of things IPMI *can* do (including serial access, VGA
snooping, LAN access, etc.) but I don't see any value it that. The main
thing here is to emulate the interface to the guest. OOB management
On 05/07/2012 10:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/07/2012 05:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
For all intents and purposes, the BMC/RSA is a separate physical
machine.
That's true for any other card on a machine.
It has a separate power source for all intents and purposes. If you
think of it in
On 05/07/2012 05:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> For all intents and purposes, the BMC/RSA is a separate physical
>>> machine.
>>
>> That's true for any other card on a machine.
>
>
> It has a separate power source for all intents and purposes. If you
> think of it in QOM terms, what connects th
On 05/07/2012 09:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/07/2012 05:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/06/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/06/2012 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
libvirt is essentially the BMC for a virtual guest. I would suggest
looki
On 05/07/2012 05:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/06/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 05/06/2012 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> libvirt is essentially the BMC for a virtual guest. I would suggest
>>> looking at implementing an IPMI int
On 05/06/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/06/2012 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
libvirt is essentially the BMC for a virtual guest. I would suggest
looking at implementing an IPMI interface to libvirt and exposing it
to the guest through a USB
On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/06/2012 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> (copied qemu-devel)
>>
>> On 05/04/2012 10:10 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>
>>> Either way, is this interesting for including into KVM?
>>
>> Not kvm, but certainly it would make a good addition to qemu, wh
On 05/06/2012 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
(copied qemu-devel)
On 05/04/2012 10:10 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
Either way, is this interesting for including into KVM?
Not kvm, but certainly it would make a good addition to qemu, which kvm
then uses.
Does anyone have any
opinions on the possibl
(copied qemu-devel)
On 05/04/2012 10:10 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> I've been working on adding an IPMI BMC as a virtual device under
> KVM. I'm
> doing this for two primary reasons, one to have a better test
> environment than
> what I have now for testing IPMI issues, and second to be able to be
15 matches
Mail list logo
