On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:27:57PM +1000, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Can anyone think of a reason why the arm primary bootloader cant be
>> done by just direct interaction with the CPU? Currently we have this
>> ...
>>
>> /
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:27:57PM +1000, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone think of a reason why the arm primary bootloader cant be
> done by just direct interaction with the CPU? Currently we have this
> ...
>
> /* The worlds second smallest bootloader. Set r0-r2, then jump to
Hi All,
Can anyone think of a reason why the arm primary bootloader cant be
done by just direct interaction with the CPU? Currently we have this
...
/* The worlds second smallest bootloader. Set r0-r2, then jump to kernel. */
static uint32_t bootloader[] = {
0xe3a0, /* mov r0, #0 */
