> On 30 Aug 2016, at 10:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> ... the only thing
> you can do is test it on the RTOSes you have to hand.
which, in the end, is a highly effective way. it does not identifies bugs
related to features not used by the RTOS, but otherwise it is even more
effective in catchi
On 08/29/2016 09:19 PM, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:59, Bill Paul wrote:
>>
>> I recently started tinkering with ChibiOS as part of a small personal
>> project ...
>
> I did most of the development for the µOS++/CMSIS++
> (http://micro-os-plus.github.io) on STM32F4DISCOVERY
On 29 August 2016 at 20:12, Bill Paul wrote:
>> The reason for this kind of thing is that the original support was
>> done to support a specific RTOS, and so bugs which resulted in that
>> RTOS not working were found and fixed. Bugs which weren't exercised
>> by that RTOS remain lurking in the cod
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Peter Maydell had to
walk into mine at 12:51:04 on Monday 29 August 2016 and say:
> On 29 August 2016 at 13:59, Bill Paul wrote:
> > Unfortunately it's been a frustrating experience because there seem to be
> > several key places where QEM
On 29 August 2016 at 15:51, Peter Maydell wrote:
> There were some patches posted to the list last year (?) which had
> a go at fixing this, but unfortunately they got stalled in code
> review and the original submitter ran out of time/energy to finish
> the job. Getting those sorted out and into
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 23:30, Bill Paul wrote:
>
> I just wish all of this was in once place.
me too.
my sources are public, and I support anyone who wants to take parts of them to
improve the main source tree.
unfortunately I do not have the resources to do this. :-(
> Currently this vector
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Liviu Ionescu had to
walk into mine at 12:19:42 on Monday 29 August 2016 and say:
> > On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:59, Bill Paul wrote:
> >
> > I recently started tinkering with ChibiOS as part of a small personal
> > project ...
>
> I did most
On 29 August 2016 at 13:59, Bill Paul wrote:
> Unfortunately it's been a frustrating experience because there seem to be
> several key places where QEMU's hardware emulation diverges from reality. The
> ChibiOS examples often seem to depend on behavior that is valid for actual
> hardware but which
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:59, Bill Paul wrote:
>
> I recently started tinkering with ChibiOS as part of a small personal project
> ...
I did most of the development for the µOS++/CMSIS++
(http://micro-os-plus.github.io) on STM32F4DISCOVERY board, emulated by GNU ARM
Eclipse QEMU, which impleme
I recently started tinkering with ChibiOS as part of a small personal project
and wanted to test some of the demo configurations that it has with a machine
simulator before going all in on a reference board. I decided to try QEMU
2.6.0. I was mainly interested in an ARM Cortex-M machine, so I fi
10 matches
Mail list logo
