On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 04:49:54PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> this email should actually be an RFC patch. But RFC patches tend to turn
> into real PATCHes (if the submitter is lucky, that is), and I can't
> really promise sending multiple versions of a PATCH at this time. So
> ple
Hi Laszlo, Michael
On 09/21/2018 08:41 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/21/18 19:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:01:30PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 09/20/2018 05:49 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Now, there's another complication, obviously -- machine type compat. In
com
Hi Laszlo,
On 09/21/2018 08:34 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/21/18 17:01, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 09/20/2018 05:49 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
I had to read this mail a few times...
Sorry :)
Now consider the following scenario:
- the firmware programs some BARs with 64-bit addresses such th
On 09/21/18 19:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:01:30PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> On 09/20/2018 05:49 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Now, there's another complication, obviously -- machine type compat. In
>>> commit 9fa99d2519cb, we added the "pci_hole64_fix" compat
On 09/21/18 17:01, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 09/20/2018 05:49 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> I had to read this mail a few times...
Sorry :)
>> Now consider the following scenario:
>>
>> - the firmware programs some BARs with 64-bit addresses such that the
>>aperture that we deduce starts at
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:01:30PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>
>
> On 09/20/2018 05:49 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > Hi Marcel,
>
> Hi Laszlo,
> I had to read this mail a few times...
>
> >
> > this email should actually be an RFC patch. But RFC patches tend to turn
> > into real PATCHes (i
On 09/20/2018 05:49 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Hi Marcel,
Hi Laszlo,
I had to read this mail a few times...
this email should actually be an RFC patch. But RFC patches tend to turn
into real PATCHes (if the submitter is lucky, that is), and I can't
really promise sending multiple versions of
Hi Marcel,
this email should actually be an RFC patch. But RFC patches tend to turn
into real PATCHes (if the submitter is lucky, that is), and I can't
really promise sending multiple versions of a PATCH at this time. So
please consider this a "maybe bug report".
In commit 9fa99d2519cb ("hw/pci-h
