On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 18:42 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 26.05.2014 14:48, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:40:54PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >> V1 -> V2:
> >> - Rebased on qom-next queue.
> >> - Patch 1/4:
> >>- Since there are a lot of discussions on t
Quoting Andreas Färber (2014-05-26 11:42:45)
> Am 26.05.2014 14:48, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:40:54PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >> V1 -> V2:
> >> - Rebased on qom-next queue.
> >> - Patch 1/4:
> >>- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
>
Am 26.05.2014 14:48, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:40:54PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> V1 -> V2:
>> - Rebased on qom-next queue.
>> - Patch 1/4:
>>- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
>> way to do the fix, added a FIXME comment to find a
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:40:54PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> V1 -> V2:
> - Rebased on qom-next queue.
> - Patch 1/4:
>- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
> way to do the fix, added a FIXME comment to find a better way.
> - Patch 2/4:
>- Addressed Michael Ro
V1 -> V2:
- Rebased on qom-next queue.
- Patch 1/4:
- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
way to do the fix, added a FIXME comment to find a better way.
- Patch 2/4:
- Addressed Michael Roth's comments:
- Added output visitor test
- Tweaked it as advised
-