On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 23:46 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Lonnie Mendez wrote:
> > lo list. I have found the old diff to be incorrect on many levels. New
> > diff has additionally cleanup code for the linux redirector. Please see
> > the attached patch for solution.
>
> Forget my last comment
Lonnie Mendez wrote:
lo list. I have found the old diff to be incorrect on many levels. New
diff has additionally cleanup code for the linux redirector. Please see
the attached patch for solution.
Forget my last comment - I understand the problem now. I think it was a
bad idea to use 'usb_r
Hi,
Calling dev->handle_reset() is redundant with usb_attach(port, NULL) and
is also incorrect because dev->handle_reset is a private helper for the
usb devices (the real message is USB_DETACH).
Regards,
Fabrice.
Lonnie Mendez wrote:
lo list. I have found the old diff to be incorrect on m
lo list. I have found the old diff to be incorrect on many levels. New
diff has additionally cleanup code for the linux redirector. Please see
the attached patch for solution.
--- qemu/vl.c 2006-07-17 03:16:38.191157512 -0500
+++ qemu/vl.c 2006-07-17 03:18:13.402683160 -0500
@@ -3781,6 +3781,7 @
lo list. The attached patch calls the cleanup message destroy when
the device is detached by the user from the guest.
--- qemu/hw/usb-hub.c 2006-05-25 18:58:51.0 -0500
+++ qemu/hw/usb-hub.c 2006-05-26 16:47:47.0 -0500
@@ -194,7 +194,6 @@
/* send the detach messa
