Il 06/08/2012 14:48, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>> > Interesting, I tested vhost (or thought so). Can you try this
>> > patch instead?
> Does this really make the code better than just reverting the patch?
The main problem here is that the current code has calls to
event_notifier
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Commit b1f416aa8d870fab71030abc9401cfc77b948e8e breaks vhost_net
> because it always registers the virtio_pci_host_notifier_read() handler
> function on the ioeventfd, even when vhost_net.ko is using the ioeventfd.
> The result is both QEMU an
Commit b1f416aa8d870fab71030abc9401cfc77b948e8e breaks vhost_net
because it always registers the virtio_pci_host_notifier_read() handler
function on the ioeventfd, even when vhost_net.ko is using the ioeventfd.
The result is both QEMU and vhost_net.ko polling on the same eventfd
and the virtio_net.
