Am 16.05.2011 18:26, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 05/16/2011 05:58 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Thanks. Still doesn't make much sense to me, the patch shouldn't change
>> anything with respect to a malloc, but I can reproduce a segfault now. I
>> think I'll have a closer look tomorrow.
>
> This fixes i
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This fixes it on top of my SCSI refactoring series.
Thanks! Works here, too, for what it's worth.
I squashed the following in when applying the "scsi: introduce
scsi_req_cancel" patch, for easier reading and to get a little closer
to warning-free compilation with gcc 4.6.
On 05/16/2011 05:58 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Thanks. Still doesn't make much sense to me, the patch shouldn't change
> anything with respect to a malloc, but I can reproduce a segfault now. I
> think I'll have a closer look tomorrow.
This fixes it on top of my SCSI refactoring series. Should I sen
Am 16.05.2011 17:43, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
>> Your instructions seemed clear enough, so I tried to reproduce your
>> problem. Now I have an ARM VM with a Debian installation that works just
>> fine and I have no idea what to use it for. ;-)
>
> So I was puzzled about this
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Your instructions seemed clear enough, so I tried to reproduce your
> problem. Now I have an ARM VM with a Debian installation that works just
> fine and I have no idea what to use it for. ;-)
So I was puzzled about this for a while, but then I had a flash
of inspiration:
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> I also reviewed the patch that you mentioned and I can't find anything
> suspicious there. I'm afraid you'll have to bite the bullet and run it
> with some debugging code yourself (if it's really related to that patch,
> you'll want to enable DPRINTF in hw/scsi-disk.c as a firs
Hi Jonathan,
Am 16.05.2011 13:23, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Hi,
>
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
>> This pulls the request completion for error cases from the caller to
>> scsi_disk_emulate_command. This should not change semantics, but allows to
>> reuse scsi_handle_write_error() for flushes in the nex
Hi,
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> This pulls the request completion for error cases from the caller to
> scsi_disk_emulate_command. This should not change semantics, but allows to
> reuse scsi_handle_write_error() for flushes in the next patch.
Today I tried out qemu-system-arm for the first time. It's f
