Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] target/s390x: Finish implementing RISBGN

2017-11-09 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:55:46 +0100 Richard Henderson wrote: > We added the entry to insn-data.def, but failed to update op_risbg > to match. No need to special-case the imask inversion, since that > is already ~0 for RISBG (and now RISBGN). > > Fixes: 375ee58bedcda359011fe7fa99e0647f66f9ffa0 >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] target/s390x: Finish implementing RISBGN

2017-11-08 Thread Richard Henderson
On 11/08/2017 12:50 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > I can queue this to s390-fixes (unless there are other takers). Please do. Thanks, r~

Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] target/s390x: Finish implementing RISBGN

2017-11-08 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:55:46 +0100 Richard Henderson wrote: > We added the entry to insn-data.def, but failed to update op_risbg > to match. No need to special-case the imask inversion, since that > is already ~0 for RISBG (and now RISBGN). > > Fixes: 375ee58bedcda359011fe7fa99e0647f66f9ffa0 >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] target/s390x: Finish implementing RISBGN

2017-11-07 Thread Peter Maydell
On 7 November 2017 at 16:00, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 07.11.2017 15:55, Richard Henderson wrote: >> We added the entry to insn-data.def, but failed to update op_risbg >> to match. No need to special-case the imask inversion, since that >> is already ~0 for RISBG (and now RISBGN). >> >> Fixes: 375e

Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] target/s390x: Finish implementing RISBGN

2017-11-07 Thread Thomas Huth
On 07.11.2017 15:55, Richard Henderson wrote: > We added the entry to insn-data.def, but failed to update op_risbg > to match. No need to special-case the imask inversion, since that > is already ~0 for RISBG (and now RISBGN). > > Fixes: 375ee58bedcda359011fe7fa99e0647f66f9ffa0 > Fixes: https://b