On 17/01/2008, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > On 17/01/2008, Bill C. Riemers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
> > > contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not
> > > l
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi,
:
: On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : andrzej zaborowski wrote:
: > : > On 17/01/2008, B
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> : > On 17/01/2008, Bill C. Riemers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : > > According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
> : > > contributor
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> : > On 17/01/2008, Bill C. Riemers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : > > According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: andrzej zaborowski wrote:
: > On 17/01/2008, Bill C. Riemers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > > According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
: > > contributors for code which specified version
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 17/01/2008, Bill C. Riemers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
> > contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not later...
>
> In order to relicense all of qemu, yes, plus contributors
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Bill C. Riemers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
> : contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not later...
>
> I said exactly this in a pre
Ricardo Almeida wrote:
> > The problem is: you would have to ask every contributor whose code is
> > still somewhere in the source code. That is tedious, and takes time (I do
> > not even think that an email would suffice).
>
> >From what I read once in a slashdot post (it's worth what is worth),
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Bill C. Riemers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
: contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not later...
I said exactly this in a previous message. At one point I rec
On 17/01/2008, Bill C. Riemers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
> contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not later...
In order to relicense all of qemu, yes, plus contributors of
BSD-licensed code, of which there
According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not later...
e.g.
* Copyright (c) 2003-2005 Fabrice Bellard
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GN
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Ricardo Almeida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > The problem is: you would have to ask every contributor whose code is
: > still somewhere in the source code. That is tedious, and takes time (I do
: > not even think that an email would suffice).
:
: >F
> The problem is: you would have to ask every contributor whose code is
> still somewhere in the source code. That is tedious, and takes time (I do
> not even think that an email would suffice).
>From what I read once in a slashdot post (it's worth what is worth),
it suffices a public announcemen
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Is GPLv3 unwanted for QEMU source code? If yes: why?
The problem is: you would have to ask every contributor whose code is
still somewhere in the source code. That is tedious, and takes time (I do
not even think that an email would suffice).
Besi
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Is GPLv3 unwanted for QEMU source code? If yes: why?
: Would it prevent inclusion of QEMU in common Linux distributions?
There's still some gplv2-only code in qemu, iirc. As such, you can't
use gplv3 code at all
Is GPLv3 unwanted for QEMU source code? If yes: why?
Would it prevent inclusion of QEMU in common Linux distributions?
Stefan
Ulrich Hecht schrieb:
> Hi!
>
> Our Teenage Mutant Legal Turtles have discovered that s390-dis.c contains
> GPLv3 code. Fortunately, the actual code has not changed since
Hi!
Our Teenage Mutant Legal Turtles have discovered that s390-dis.c contains
GPLv3 code. Fortunately, the actual code has not changed since the last
GPLv2 binutils release, save for the license headers, so it suffices to
change those back to fix the problem.
CU
Uli
--
SUSE LINUX Products Gm
17 matches
Mail list logo
