On 27.01.2013, at 15:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Anup Patel writes:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
>> desktop ?
>>
>> I know folks have already thought about this and probably also tried
>> something or other on this front but, it w
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:12:20AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25.01.2013, at 20:04, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel
> >>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 25.01.2013, at 20:04, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> How about having a generic Virtio-based mach
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 25.01.2013, at 20:04, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
> >> desktop ?
> >
> > I have a
On 25.01.2013, at 20:04, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
>> desktop ?
>
> I have also thought about this, current virtio design is not very
> clean. On the downside,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 24.01.2013, at 10:25, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
> >> possible guest OSes can have support for it
On 24.01.2013, at 15:42, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 January 2013 14:38, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> But check out the QEMU e500 machine. We have a fully device tree
>> based machine type in the kernel. QEMU drives it by generating a
>> device tree for devices it actually exposes on the fly.
>
>
On 24 January 2013 14:38, Alexander Graf wrote:
> But check out the QEMU e500 machine. We have a fully device tree
> based machine type in the kernel. QEMU drives it by generating a
> device tree for devices it actually exposes on the fly.
The ARM equivalent for that would be mach-virt, I think
(
On 24.01.2013, at 10:25, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>> IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
>> possible guest OSes can have support for it and different hypervisor can
>> emulate it without worrying about g
