On 28 November 2016 at 14:07, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Er... actually mach-virt is 123, as we only allocate 123 redistributors.
Oh yes, I'd forgotten about that limit. We'd need to add
a KVM API for allocating redistributors in non-contiguous
bits of memory if we wanted to raise that.
thanks
-- PMM
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:04:45PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:30:54PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 28 November 2016 at 11:58, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >> On 28 November 2016 at 11:12, Alex Bennée
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:30:54PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 November 2016 at 11:58, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 28 November 2016 at 11:12, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Andrew Jones writes:
> >> >> I've skimmed over
On 28 November 2016 at 11:58, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 28 November 2016 at 11:12, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> >
>> > Andrew Jones writes:
>> >> I've skimmed over everything looking at it from a framwork/sytle
>> >> perspective. I didn't
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 November 2016 at 11:12, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Jones writes:
> >> I've skimmed over everything looking at it from a framwork/sytle
> >> perspective. I didn't dig in trying to understand the tests though.
> >> One ge
On 28 November 2016 at 11:12, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Andrew Jones writes:
>> I've skimmed over everything looking at it from a framwork/sytle
>> perspective. I didn't dig in trying to understand the tests though.
>> One general comment, I see many tests introduce MAX_CPUS 8. Why do
>> that? Why n
Andrew Jones writes:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:10:22PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looking at my records it seems as though it has been a while since I
>> last posted these tests. As I'm hoping to get the final bits of MTTCG
>> merged upstream on the next QEMU development cycle I'v
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:10:22PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking at my records it seems as though it has been a while since I
> last posted these tests. As I'm hoping to get the final bits of MTTCG
> merged upstream on the next QEMU development cycle I've been re-basing
> these and g
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:10:22PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking at my records it seems as though it has been a while since I
> last posted these tests. As I'm hoping to get the final bits of MTTCG
> merged upstream on the next QEMU development cycle I've been re-basing
> these and g
Hi,
Looking at my records it seems as though it has been a while since I
last posted these tests. As I'm hoping to get the final bits of MTTCG
merged upstream on the next QEMU development cycle I've been re-basing
these and getting them cleaned up for merging.
Some of the patches might be worth t
10 matches
Mail list logo
