On 12/12/2014 17:10, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Ok, this looks specific enough that an out-of-band solution within DPDK
> > sounds like the best approach. It seems unnecessary to involve the
> > hypervisor (neither KVM nor QEMU).
>
> Paolo, I don't understand why you don't imagine controlling fr
2014-12-12 15:50, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 12/12/2014 14:00, Carew, Alan wrote:
> > The problem is deterministic control of host CPU frequency and the DPDK
> > usage
> > model.
> > A hands-off power governor will scale based on workload, whether this is a
> > host
> > application or VM, so no problems
On 12/12/2014 14:00, Carew, Alan wrote:
> The problem is deterministic control of host CPU frequency and the DPDK usage
> model.
> A hands-off power governor will scale based on workload, whether this is a
> host
> application or VM, so no problems or bug there.
>
> Where this solution fits is
Hi Paolo,
> 2014-12-09 18:35, Paolo Bonzini:
> > Did you make any progress in Qemu/KVM community?
> > We need to be sync'ed up with them to be sure we share the same
> goal.
> > I want also to avoid using a solution which doesn't fit with
> > their plan.
> > Remember that
2014-12-09 18:35, Paolo Bonzini:
> Did you make any progress in Qemu/KVM community?
> We need to be sync'ed up with them to be sure we share the same goal.
> I want also to avoid using a solution which doesn't fit with their
> plan.
> Remember that we already had this probl
Tim,
cc-ing Paolo and qemu-devel@ again in order to get their take on it.
Did you make any progress in Qemu/KVM community?
We need to be sync'ed up with them to be sure we share the same goal.
I want also to avoid using a solution which doesn't fit with their plan.
Remember that we already had
