On 03/26/2014 08:05 AM, Tom Musta wrote:
> On 3/25/2014 1:06 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Looking at this a little more closely, why aren't we
>> just using the _round_to_zero versions of the float
>> to int conversion softfloat functions? (This is how
>> we implement fctiwz vs fctiw, for instance.)
On 3/25/2014 1:06 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Looking at this a little more closely, why aren't we
> just using the _round_to_zero versions of the float
> to int conversion softfloat functions? (This is how
> we implement fctiwz vs fctiw, for instance.)
Unfortunately, the softfloat list of these fu
On 3/25/2014 1:06 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Looking at this a little more closely, why aren't we
> just using the _round_to_zero versions of the float
> to int conversion softfloat functions? (This is how
> we implement fctiwz vs fctiw, for instance.)
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
Fair question, Pe
On 23 March 2014 21:52, Tom Musta wrote:
> The various VSX Convert to Integer instructions should truncate the
> mantissa. This fix forces the softfloat rounding mode to "round to
> zero" prior to performing the conversion. After the conversion is
> completed, the internal rounding mode is resto
The various VSX Convert to Integer instructions should truncate the
mantissa. This fix forces the softfloat rounding mode to "round to
zero" prior to performing the conversion. After the conversion is
completed, the internal rounding mode is restored from the PowerPC
FPSCR bits.
Signed-off-by: T
