Hi,
>> 'dev-' isn't the greated pick as it is somewhat generic indeed. I've
>> also considered 'emu-' (to contrast with host-*), but it has pretty much
>> the same issue. Other suggestions?
>
> Looks like all your dev- actually start with dev-usb-.
No, they don't, I've dropped 'usb-' prefix
Il 09/03/2012 07:50, Gerd Hoffmann ha scritto:
> I want a prefix because with prefixing you get the files nicely grouped
> in directory listings, without creating another directory level, which
> would IMHO be overkill for the number of files we have here.
>
> 'dev-*' is used for emulated usb devi
Gerd Hoffmann writes:
> Hi,
>
>> For another, dev-foo.c is not natural English for a certain type of
>> device - foo-dev.c would be better but I'd prefer without "dev", i.e.,
>> hw/usb/{audio,ccid,...}.c. And then of course only devices should go
>> into hw/.
>
> I want a prefix because with pr
Hi,
> For another, dev-foo.c is not natural English for a certain type of
> device - foo-dev.c would be better but I'd prefer without "dev", i.e.,
> hw/usb/{audio,ccid,...}.c. And then of course only devices should go
> into hw/.
I want a prefix because with prefixing you get the files nicely g
On 03/08/2012 03:16 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Plan is basically to move all usb stuff to hw/usb/
Comments?
It's easy to bikeshed something like this but since it's clearly an improvement
over what we have right now, I'm all for it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
cheers,
Gerd
Gerd H
Am 08.03.2012 10:16, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
> Plan is basically to move all usb stuff to hw/usb/
>
> Comments?
hw/usb/ is fine with me (hw/ide/ is precedence), but I strongly dislike
the dev-*.c convention you've used:
For one thing, we'd have to rename 90+% of hw/ to be consistent.
For another
Hi,
Plan is basically to move all usb stuff to hw/usb/
Comments?
cheers,
Gerd
Gerd Hoffmann (2):
usb: the big rename
usb: zap hw/ush-{ohic,uhci}.h + init wrappers
Makefile.objs | 22 --
Makefile.target|2 +-
co
