Sorry, I do not know. I thought we should always add RFC all though
the patch's life...
What is the prefix i should add? PATH 0 ?
2017-02-24 19:42 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody :
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:09:31PM +0800, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> 2017-02-24 11:52 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody :
>> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 a
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:09:31PM +0800, Jaze Lee wrote:
> 2017-02-24 11:52 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody :
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:50:03PM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: tianqing
> >>
> >> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> >> iov to buf or vice versa
2017-02-24 11:52 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody :
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:50:03PM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: tianqing
>>
>> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
>> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: tianqing
>> ---
>
>
> This is marked
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:50:03PM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: tianqing
>
> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: tianqing
> ---
This is marked as an RFC still - is this a series you would like
From: tianqing
Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
iov to buf or vice versa any more.
Signed-off-by: tianqing
---
block/rbd.c | 80 ++---
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/blo
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:43:36AM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: tianqing
>
> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: tianqing
> ---
> block/rbd.c | 79
> ++--
Hi,
This series failed build test on s390x host. Please find the details below.
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd
Message-id: 20170221034336.10097-1-jaze...@gmail.com
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
# Testing script will be invoked under the
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd
Message-id: 20170221034336.10097-1-jaze...@gmail.com
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
total
From: tianqing
Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
iov to buf or vice versa any more.
Signed-off-by: tianqing
---
block/rbd.c | 79 ++---
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/blo
