Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-24 Thread Jaze Lee
Sorry, I do not know. I thought we should always add RFC all though the patch's life... What is the prefix i should add? PATH 0 ? 2017-02-24 19:42 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody : > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:09:31PM +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: >> 2017-02-24 11:52 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody : >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 a

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-24 Thread Jeff Cody
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:09:31PM +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > 2017-02-24 11:52 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody : > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:50:03PM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote: > >> From: tianqing > >> > >> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform > >> iov to buf or vice versa

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-23 Thread Jaze Lee
2017-02-24 11:52 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody : > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:50:03PM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote: >> From: tianqing >> >> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform >> iov to buf or vice versa any more. >> >> Signed-off-by: tianqing >> --- > > > This is marked

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-23 Thread Jeff Cody
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:50:03PM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote: > From: tianqing > > Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform > iov to buf or vice versa any more. > > Signed-off-by: tianqing > --- This is marked as an RFC still - is this a series you would like

[Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-20 Thread jazeltq
From: tianqing Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform iov to buf or vice versa any more. Signed-off-by: tianqing --- block/rbd.c | 80 ++--- 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/blo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-20 Thread Jeff Cody
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:43:36AM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote: > From: tianqing > > Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform > iov to buf or vice versa any more. > > Signed-off-by: tianqing > --- > block/rbd.c | 79 > ++--

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-20 Thread no-reply
Hi, This series failed build test on s390x host. Please find the details below. Type: series Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd Message-id: 20170221034336.10097-1-jaze...@gmail.com === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash # Testing script will be invoked under the

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-20 Thread no-reply
Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd Message-id: 20170221034336.10097-1-jaze...@gmail.com === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash BASE=base n=1 total

[Qemu-devel] [RFC v6] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd

2017-02-20 Thread jazeltq
From: tianqing Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform iov to buf or vice versa any more. Signed-off-by: tianqing --- block/rbd.c | 79 ++--- 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/blo