On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER
wrote:
> Hi, I would like to bench it with small 4k read/write.
>
> On the ceph side,do we need this PR ? :
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13447
Yes, that is the correct PR for the client-side librbd changes. You
should be able to test it
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:00:02PM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: tianqing
>
> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: tianqing
> ---
> block/rbd.c | 49 ++-
On 02/16/2017 03:00 AM, jaze...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: tianqing
>
> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
In general, we prefer new revisions of a patch series to be sent as a
new top-level thread, rather than buried in-reply-
>>No yet. I just test on one qemu-kvm vm. It works fine.
>>The performance may need more time.
>>Any one can test on this patch if you do fast
Hi, I would like to bench it with small 4k read/write.
On the ceph side,do we need this PR ? :
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13447
- Mail
Tianqing,
Do we have any performance data for this patch? Thanks.
Tiger
> 在 2017年2月16日，下午5:00，jaze...@gmail.com 写道：
>
> From: tianqing
>
> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: tianqing
> ---
> block/rbd.c
2017-02-16 22:14 GMT+08:00 Jason Dillaman :
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 4:00 AM, wrote:
>> From: tianqing
>>
>> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
>> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: tianqing
>> ---
>> block/rbd.c | 49
No yet. I just test on one qemu-kvm vm. It works fine.
The performance may need more time.
Any one can test on this patch if you do fast
2017-02-16 20:07 GMT+08:00 Tiger Hu :
> Tianqing,
>
> Do we have any performance data for this patch? Thanks.
>
> Tiger
>> 在 2017年2月16日，下午5:00，jaze...@gmail.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 4:00 AM, wrote:
> From: tianqing
>
> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: tianqing
> ---
> block/rbd.c | 49 ++---
> 1 file changed, 42 in
From: tianqing
Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
iov to buf or vice versa any more.
Signed-off-by: tianqing
---
block/rbd.c | 49 ++---
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/bl
