On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Frederic Konrad
wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 10:23, Alvise Rigo wrote:
>>
>> This is the third iteration of the patch series; starting from PATCH 007
>> there are the changes to move the whole work to multi-threading.
>> Changes versus previous versions are at the botto
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Mark Burton wrote:
>
> To be clear, for a normal user (e.g. they boot linux, they run some apps,
> etc)..., if they use only one core, is it true that they will see no
> difference in performance?
I didn't test the one core scenario, but I expect les
On 10/07/2015 10:23, Alvise Rigo wrote:
This is the third iteration of the patch series; starting from PATCH 007
there are the changes to move the whole work to multi-threading.
Changes versus previous versions are at the bottom of this cover letter.
This patch series provides an infrastructure
To be clear, for a normal user (e.g. they boot linux, they run some apps,
etc)..., if they use only one core, is it true that they will see no difference
in performance?
For a ‘normal user’ who does use multi-core, are you saying that a typical boot
is slower?
Cheers
Mark.
> On 10 Jul 2015,
This is the third iteration of the patch series; starting from PATCH 007
there are the changes to move the whole work to multi-threading.
Changes versus previous versions are at the bottom of this cover letter.
This patch series provides an infrastructure for atomic
instruction implementation in Q
