On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 31/05/2015 08:11, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> The goal is to split the functions such that cpu-exec is CPU specific
>> content, while cpus.c is generic code only. The function interface to
>> cpu-exec needs to be virtualised to prepare
On 05/30/2015 11:11 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> The goal is to split the functions such that cpu-exec is CPU specific
> content, while cpus.c is generic code only. The function interface to
> cpu-exec needs to be virtualised to prepare support for multi-arch and
> moving these definitions out sa
On 31/05/2015 08:11, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> The goal is to split the functions such that cpu-exec is CPU specific
> content, while cpus.c is generic code only. The function interface to
> cpu-exec needs to be virtualised to prepare support for multi-arch and
> moving these definitions out sav
The goal is to split the functions such that cpu-exec is CPU specific
content, while cpus.c is generic code only. The function interface to
cpu-exec needs to be virtualised to prepare support for multi-arch and
moving these definitions out saves bloating the QOM interface. So
move these definitions