On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:22:10PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:55:43AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:49:22 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:58:03PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > > >
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:55:43AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:49:22 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:58:03PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > > +if (xcc->host_cpuid_required && enable_cpu_pm) {
> > > > > > +host_c
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:49:22 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:58:03PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > +if (xcc->host_cpuid_required && enable_cpu_pm) {
> > > > > +host_cpuid(5, 0, &cpu->mwait.eax, &cpu->mwait.ebx,
> > > > > + &c
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:58:03PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
[...]
> > > > +if (xcc->host_cpuid_required && enable_cpu_pm) {
> > > > +host_cpuid(5, 0, &cpu->mwait.eax, &cpu->mwait.ebx,
> > > > + &cpu->mwait.ecx, &cpu->mwait.edx);
> > > > +}
> > > could this sta
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:57:19 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:56:05PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 23:59:19 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > When guest CPU PM is enabled, and with -cpu host, expose the host CPU
> > > MWAIT lea
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:56:05PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 23:59:19 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > When guest CPU PM is enabled, and with -cpu host, expose the host CPU
> > MWAIT leaf to guest so guest can make good PM decisions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 23:59:19 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> When guest CPU PM is enabled, and with -cpu host, expose the host CPU
> MWAIT leaf to guest so guest can make good PM decisions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> This builds but is untested. Is this a reasonable way
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:59:19PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> When guest CPU PM is enabled, and with -cpu host, expose the host CPU
> MWAIT leaf to guest so guest can make good PM decisions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> This builds but is untested. Is this a reasonable
Hi,
This series failed docker-mingw@fedora build test. Please find the testing
commands and
their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
Type: series
Message-id: 20180608205830.308627-1-...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC untested PATCH] i386
When guest CPU PM is enabled, and with -cpu host, expose the host CPU
MWAIT leaf to guest so guest can make good PM decisions.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
This builds but is untested. Is this a reasonable way to go about it?
target/i386/cpu.h | 9 +
target/i386/cpu.c | 18 ++
10 matches
Mail list logo
