Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-27 Thread Frederic Konrad
ad" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: "peter maydell" , quint...@redhat.com, "mark burton" , dgilb...@redhat.com, "amit shah" , vilan...@ac.upc.edu, "sebastian tanase" , "camille begue" Envoyé: Jeudi 26 Juin 2014 17:32:57 Objet: Re: [Qemu-de

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-26 Thread Sebastian Tanase
uot;Paolo Bonzini" > À: "Frederic Konrad" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Cc: "peter maydell" , quint...@redhat.com, "mark > burton" , > dgilb...@redhat.com, "amit shah" , vilan...@ac.upc.edu, > "sebastian tanase" > , "camille

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 26/06/2014 17:11, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: Are you talking of this patch on the list: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg03039.html ? It seems to includes the "align" options too. Is that possible to split it up? Sure, you can split it up and when the original auth

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-26 Thread Frederic Konrad
On 26/06/2014 15:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 26/06/2014 15:55, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: On 26/06/2014 12:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 26/06/2014 10:17, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: Hi, You mean adding cexe as a suboption of icount? Is both option related? I mean reverse execution needs ico

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-26 Thread Frederic Konrad
On 26/06/2014 12:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 26/06/2014 10:17, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: Hi, You mean adding cexe as a suboption of icount? Is both option related? I mean reverse execution needs icount but I think it doesn't make sense to make it as icount suboption? I think it does. The

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 26/06/2014 15:55, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: On 26/06/2014 12:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 26/06/2014 10:17, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: Hi, You mean adding cexe as a suboption of icount? Is both option related? I mean reverse execution needs icount but I think it doesn't make sense to ma

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 26/06/2014 10:17, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: Hi, You mean adding cexe as a suboption of icount? Is both option related? I mean reverse execution needs icount but I think it doesn't make sense to make it as icount suboption? I think it does. The implementation relies heavily on icount.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-26 Thread Frederic Konrad
On 25/06/2014 17:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 25/06/2014 17:19, fred.kon...@greensocs.com ha scritto: From: KONRAD Frederic Hi everybody, This is the fifth version of this RFC (see the changes below). Those are the two first patch-set we have been worked on for reverse execution. The first

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-25 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 25/06/2014 17:19, fred.kon...@greensocs.com ha scritto: From: KONRAD Frederic Hi everybody, This is the fifth version of this RFC (see the changes below). Those are the two first patch-set we have been worked on for reverse execution. The first part is fully reviewed except the "icount: i

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.

2014-06-25 Thread fred . konrad
From: KONRAD Frederic Hi everybody, This is the fifth version of this RFC (see the changes below). Those are the two first patch-set we have been worked on for reverse execution. The first part is fully reviewed except the "icount: introduce icount timer" patch maybe we can merge them? The fi