Il 31/07/2014 15:05, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
>>>
>>
>> I think that our first patch set part (icount fixes and icount based
>> clock) is fully reviewed and can be upstreamed,
>> but since the reverse execution mechanism itself is very similar
>> between our series and Pavels, while Pavel’s
>> s
On 30/07/2014 16:51, Frederic Konrad wrote:
On 30/07/2014 15:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/07/2014 15:19, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
Start by submitting only the icount-based
implementation, the other can come later.
Paolo
Hi all,
I think that's actually our implementation cover no?
(http:
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> Il 30/07/2014 09:44, Pavel Dovgaluk ha scritto:
> >> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> >> Bonzini
> - patch 16 should also use subsections, and perhaps apply to all other
> CPUs too?
> >>>
> >>>
On 30/07/2014 15:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/07/2014 15:19, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
Start by submitting only the icount-based
implementation, the other can come later.
Paolo
Hi all,
I think that's actually our implementation cover no?
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-
Il 30/07/2014 15:19, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
>> Start by submitting only the icount-based
>> implementation, the other can come later.
>>
>> Paolo
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think that's actually our implementation cover no?
> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-07/msg00677.html)
Yes,
On 30/07/2014 11:25, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/07/2014 09:44, Pavel Dovgaluk ha scritto:
From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo Bonzini
- patch 16 should also use subsections, and perhaps apply to all other
CPUs too?
We implemented replay only for i386 and A
Il 30/07/2014 09:44, Pavel Dovgaluk ha scritto:
>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
>> Bonzini
- patch 16 should also use subsections, and perhaps apply to all other
CPUs too?
>>>
>>> We implemented replay only for i386 and ARM. If we'll change oth
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> >> - patch 16 should also use subsections, and perhaps apply to all other
> >> CPUs too?
> >
> > We implemented replay only for i386 and ARM. If we'll change other
> > targets, it will not
> > add record/replay
Il 28/07/2014 09:50, Pavel Dovgaluk ha scritto:
>> - patches 2 to 13 probably should try to use subsections, so that VMs
>> that do not use the devices try not to save the extra data and keep
>> backwards migration compatibility (at least try to)
>
> Could you give me and example?
> As I know, s
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> Il 17/07/2014 13:01, Pavel Dovgalyuk ha scritto:
> > This set of patches is related to the reverse execution and deterministic
> > replay of qemu execution Our implementation of deterministic replay can
> > be u
Il 17/07/2014 13:01, Pavel Dovgalyuk ha scritto:
> This set of patches is related to the reverse execution and deterministic
> replay of qemu execution Our implementation of deterministic replay can
> be used for deterministic and reverse debugging of guest code through gdb
> remote interface.
On 17/07/2014 13:01, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
This set of patches is related to the reverse execution and deterministic
replay of qemu execution Our implementation of deterministic replay can
be used for deterministic and reverse debugging of guest code through gdb
remote interface.
Execution rec
This set of patches is related to the reverse execution and deterministic
replay of qemu execution Our implementation of deterministic replay can
be used for deterministic and reverse debugging of guest code through gdb
remote interface.
Execution recording writes non-deterministic events log,
13 matches
Mail list logo
