On 01/10/2012 05:44 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Harsh Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 01/09/2012 09:31 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not
support strings in trac
* Harsh Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 09:31 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> * Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
>>> Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not
>>> support strings in trace record format. Introducing new trace fo
On 01/09/2012 09:31 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not
support strings in trace record format. Introducing new trace format as
discussed earlier on list to support variable num
* Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not
> support strings in trace record format. Introducing new trace format as
> discussed earlier on list to support variable number/size of arguments.
> (Ref: http://lists.gn
Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not
support strings in trace record format. Introducing new trace format as
discussed earlier on list to support variable number/size of arguments.
(Ref: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg03426.html)
Basic tes
