On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:10:29PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:49:57PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:42:47AM +01
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:49:57PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> >> Il 28/03/2013 08:55, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:15:06PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:55:51PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>> > It seems the AioContext vs glib issue has
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:15:06PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:55:51PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> > It seems the AioContext vs glib issue hasn't been settled yet. My take
> > is that glib is preferrable
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:49:57PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 28/03/2013 08:55, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
> >> >3rd. block layer's AioContext will block other Aio
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 28/03/2013 08:55, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
>> >3rd. block layer's AioContext will block other AioContexts on the same
>> > thread.
>>
>> I cannot understand this.
>
>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:55:51PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> > From: Liu Ping Fan
> >
> > These series aim to make the whole network re-entrant, here only apply
> > backend and frontend,
> > and for the netcore, separated patches ha
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:55:52PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:55:51PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> > From: Liu Ping Fan
> >
> > These series aim to make the whole network re-entrant, here only apply
> > backend and frontend,
> > and for the netcore, separated patc
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:55:51PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> From: Liu Ping Fan
>
> These series aim to make the whole network re-entrant, here only apply
> backend and frontend,
> and for the netcore, separated patches have been sent out. All of these will
> prepare us for
> moving towards
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/03/2013 08:55, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
> >3rd. block layer's AioContext will block other AioContexts on the same
> > thread.
>
> I cannot understand this.
The plan is for BlockDriverState to be bound to an AioContext. T
Il 28/03/2013 08:55, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
> disadvantage for current AioContext
>1st. need to define and expand interface for other fd events, while glib
> open this interface for user *
True.
>2nd. need to add support for IOCanReadHandler, while gsource provide
> prepare, check m
From: Liu Ping Fan
These series aim to make the whole network re-entrant, here only apply backend
and frontend,
and for the netcore, separated patches have been sent out. All of these will
prepare us for
moving towards making network layer mutlit-thread.
Finally it would be omething like
qe
12 matches
Mail list logo
