On 20.02.2017 12:22, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.02.2017 um 12:04 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 13.02.2017 18:22, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Mow that blk_insert_bs() requests the BlockBackend permissions for the
>>> node it attaches to, it can fail. Instead of aborting, pass the errors
>>> to the calle
Am 20.02.2017 um 12:04 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 13.02.2017 18:22, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Mow that blk_insert_bs() requests the BlockBackend permissions for the
> > node it attaches to, it can fail. Instead of aborting, pass the errors
> > to the callers.
>
> So it does qualify as a FIXME, bu
On 13.02.2017 18:22, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Mow that blk_insert_bs() requests the BlockBackend permissions for the
> node it attaches to, it can fail. Instead of aborting, pass the errors
> to the callers.
So it does qualify as a FIXME, but just for a single patch. Good. :-)
> Signed-off-by: Kevin W
On Mon, 02/13 18:22, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Mow that blk_insert_bs() requests the BlockBackend permissions for the
Now? :)
> node it attaches to, it can fail. Instead of aborting, pass the errors
> to the callers.
>
[snip]
> @@ -332,11 +348,17 @@ int bdrv_commit(BlockDriverState *bs)
>
> /
Mow that blk_insert_bs() requests the BlockBackend permissions for the
node it attaches to, it can fail. Instead of aborting, pass the errors
to the callers.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
---
block/backup.c | 5 -
block/block-backend.c| 12
block/commi