Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/10] make qed and live migration usage safe

2012-03-20 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 06:32:19PM +0100, Benoît Canet wrote: > QED + live migration is an unsafe and disabled mix. > > This patchset make qed and live migration safe to use. > > The check of QED images is delayed during the incoming migration. > After the migration complete the QED images are ch

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/10] make qed and live migration usage safe

2012-03-16 Thread Benoît Canet
gentle ping :) On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Benoît Canet wrote: > QED + live migration is an unsafe and disabled mix. > > This patchset make qed and live migration safe to use. > > The check of QED images is delayed during the incoming migration. > After the migration complete the QED images

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/10] make qed and live migration usage safe

2012-03-06 Thread Benoît Canet
I'm resending you this one in private because your emails where missing in the first posting. Regards Benoît On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Benoît Canet wrote: > QED + live migration is an unsafe and disabled mix. > > This patchset make qed and live migration safe to use. > > The check of QED

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/10] make qed and live migration usage safe

2012-03-06 Thread Benoît Canet
QED + live migration is an unsafe and disabled mix. This patchset make qed and live migration safe to use. The check of QED images is delayed during the incoming migration. After the migration complete the QED images are checked. Benoît Canet (10): block: Add new BDRV_O_INCOMING flag to notice