Gerd Hoffmann writes:
> Hi,
>
>> I think the main decision point here is whether we introduce a separate
>> chardev_add/chardev_del command or just use the qom-create command that has
>> been posted previously.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series + qom-create to look at and play
> with?
Hi,
> I think the main decision point here is whether we introduce a separate
> chardev_add/chardev_del command or just use the qom-create command that has
> been posted previously.
Do you have a git tree with this series + qom-create to look at and play
with?
thanks,
Gerd
Hi,
This has long been on my TODO list. I wanted to put this forward since Gerd
has a chardev hotplug series. I think there are a few good reasons to go the
QOM route here. Most notably:
1) the conversion cleans up all of the printfs into proper error messages
2) it becomes possible to introsp
