On 24 July 2014 16:52, Alex Bennée wrote:
> I don't think this patch set is mergable as-is because we still
> include a bunch of 32 bit ARM boards in the aarch64-softmmu build
> which could be using an old enough ARM that has support for 1k page
> tables (and may even use them?).
We can certainly
Hi,
While doing some performance analysis on aarch64 system emulation I
noticed a fairly high utilisation of cpu_arm_exec and the related find
next TB machinery. Peter pointed it this is probably not helped by
that fact TARGET_PAGE_BITS was set to 10 (1k pages) which would imply
less chaining of T
