On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:06:44PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 27/06/2013 10:17, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> >>> > > Il 26/06/2013 05:59, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> >>> > > This leads to another observation: a sync:'none' block-backup job
> >>> > > probably should never complete, and should ins
Il 27/06/2013 10:17, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>>> > > Il 26/06/2013 05:59, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
>>> > > This leads to another observation: a sync:'none' block-backup job
>>> > > probably should never complete, and should instead go on until explicit
>>> > > cancellation. This is because the jo
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:31:19PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 06/26 09:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 26/06/2013 05:59, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> > This leads to another observation: a sync:'none' block-backup job
> > probably should never complete, and should instead go on until explicit
> >
On Wed, 06/26 09:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 26/06/2013 05:59, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> >
> > The block job originally had total control over target bs: when the job
> > completes, the target is deleted. Now it's shared with NBD, so we should
> > make
> > sure the job completion or canceling wou
Il 26/06/2013 05:59, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
>
> The block job originally had total control over target bs: when the job
> completes, the target is deleted. Now it's shared with NBD, so we should make
> sure the job completion or canceling wouldn't crash NBD server. This patch
> doesn't handle this
This series adds partial support for point-in-time snapshot NBD exporting based
on drive-backup. The ideas is described below and patches followed (the missing
part is item 3, which work is in progress by Ian Main and will have another
patch on it). As the work does not overlap, these series should
