Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/29/2013 02:24 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Applied. Thanks. Script botch-up? This series has a title of RFC (which means it should not be applied as-is), and there have been later revisions that dropped the RFC in response to comments; did the correct version get applied? -- Eric Blake

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-29 Thread Anthony Liguori
Applied. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-29 Thread Anthony Liguori
Applied. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-21 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 02:09:20PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi, > > Am 18.07.2013 10:27, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum: > > Running qemu with "-device ?" option returns ~145 lines. > > It is hard to manage understanding the output. > > > > Theses patches aim to partially solve the problem by div

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-21 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi, Am 18.07.2013 10:27, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum: > Running qemu with "-device ?" option returns ~145 lines. > It is hard to manage understanding the output. > > Theses patches aim to partially solve the problem by dividing the devices > into logical categories like "Network/Display/..." and sor

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-18 Thread Eric Blake
On 07/18/2013 07:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 18/07/2013 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: >> Running qemu with "-device ?" option returns ~145 lines. >> It is hard to manage understanding the output. >> >> Theses patches aim to partially solve the problem by dividing the devices >> into logi

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-18 Thread Marcel Apfelbaum
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 15:56 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 18/07/2013 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: > > Running qemu with "-device ?" option returns ~145 lines. > > It is hard to manage understanding the output. > > > > Theses patches aim to partially solve the problem by dividing the devi

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 18/07/2013 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: > Running qemu with "-device ?" option returns ~145 lines. > It is hard to manage understanding the output. > > Theses patches aim to partially solve the problem by dividing the devices > into logical categories like "Network/Display/..." and sorti

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-18 Thread Marcel Apfelbaum
Running qemu with "-device ?" option returns ~145 lines. It is hard to manage understanding the output. Theses patches aim to partially solve the problem by dividing the devices into logical categories like "Network/Display/..." and sorting them by it. Marcel Apfelbaum (2): qemu-help: Sort devi

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-help: improve -device command line help

2013-07-18 Thread Marcel Apfelbaum
Running qemu with "-device ?" option returns ~145 lines. It is hard to manage understanding the output. Theses patches aim to partially solve the problem by dividing the devices into logical categories like "Network/Display/..." and sorting them by it. Marcel Apfelbaum (2): qemu-help: Sort devi