> This patch is needed as is. One real risk this is protecting
> against is the call of cpu_interrupt(cpu_foo) when the calling
> thread is not cpu_foo's thread--this write to interrupt_request
> might race with other writes, e.g. another call to cpu_interrupt
> from another thread, or the clearin
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 18:09:48 -0700, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 23/08/2015 17:23, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
> > ---
> > cpu-exec.c | 9 ++---
> > exec.c | 2 +-
> > hw/openrisc/cputimer.c | 2 +-
On 23/08/2015 17:23, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
> ---
> cpu-exec.c | 9 ++---
> exec.c | 2 +-
> hw/openrisc/cputimer.c | 2 +-
> qom/cpu.c | 4 ++--
> target-arm/helper-a
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
---
cpu-exec.c | 9 ++---
exec.c | 2 +-
hw/openrisc/cputimer.c | 2 +-
qom/cpu.c | 4 ++--
target-arm/helper-a64.c| 2 +-
target-arm/helper.c
