On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 05:05:25PM +, Oleinik, Alexander wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 12:25 -0400, John Snow wrote:
> >
> > On 7/24/19 11:23 PM, Oleinik, Alexander wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Oleinik
> >
> > Is there some explanation for why the below patch does what the
> > subj
On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 12:25 -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
> On 7/24/19 11:23 PM, Oleinik, Alexander wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Oleinik
>
> Is there some explanation for why the below patch does what the
> subject
> line claims for the uninitiated?
When multiqueue mode (VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) is d
On 7/24/19 11:23 PM, Oleinik, Alexander wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Oleinik
Is there some explanation for why the below patch does what the subject
line claims for the uninitiated?
I don't know why increasing the number of queues from 2 to 3 here is
correct in the general case, OR why i
Signed-off-by: Alexander Oleinik
---
tests/libqos/virtio-net.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/libqos/virtio-net.c b/tests/libqos/virtio-net.c
index 66405b646e..247a0a17a8 100644
--- a/tests/libqos/virtio-net.c
+++ b/tests/libqos/virtio-net.c
@@ -51,7 +51