On 11/13/2011 07:27 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
The default is still 3, and I didn't change older machine types.
Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
---
Is there a better way then copy pasting this to the older pc types to get
the revision == 2 for them as well?
Hi,
> I mean, change stable-0.15 so that if it is invoked with -M 0.14, you
> get a rev 2 qxl device.
0.15 has qxl rev 2 too, 1.0 got rev 3. No need to do anything for
-stable. Also 0.15 didn't got its own machine type, so the pc-0.14
compat property (master branch) covers both 0.14 and 0.15.
On 11/14/2011 07:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 11:45 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 06:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Antony, can you apply this directly or do you wanna have a
single-patch-pull-request instead?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I'll apply directly.
>>
>> Does stabl
On 11/14/2011 11:45 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/14/2011 06:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Antony, can you apply this directly or do you wanna have a
single-patch-pull-request instead?
Yes, I'll apply directly.
Does stable-0.15 need it too?
You mean to set the revision to 2 for 0.14, right?
On 11/14/2011 06:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Antony, can you apply this directly or do you wanna have a
>> single-patch-pull-request instead?
>
>
> Yes, I'll apply directly.
Does stable-0.15 need it too?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
On 11/14/2011 09:55 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 11/14/11 12:44, Alon Levy wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:40:57AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 11/13/11 14:27, Alon Levy wrote:
The default is still 3, and I didn't change older machine types.
Looks good to me.
ok, so do you want another
On 11/14/11 12:44, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:40:57AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> On 11/13/11 14:27, Alon Levy wrote:
>>> The default is still 3, and I didn't change older machine types.
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>
> ok, so do you want another email with subject PATCH or can
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:40:57AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 11/13/11 14:27, Alon Levy wrote:
> > The default is still 3, and I didn't change older machine types.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
ok, so do you want another email with subject PATCH or can I consider
this in the queue?
> > Signed-o
On 11/13/11 14:27, Alon Levy wrote:
> The default is still 3, and I didn't change older machine types.
Looks good to me.
> Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
> ---
> Is there a better way then copy pasting this to the older pc types to get
> the revision == 2 for them as well?
Unfortunaly not, although w
The default is still 3, and I didn't change older machine types.
Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
---
Is there a better way then copy pasting this to the older pc types to get
the revision == 2 for them as well?
hw/pc_piix.c | 12
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff -
10 matches
Mail list logo
