On 25 February 2014 18:52, Juan Quintela wrote:
> BTW, did you find this bug by testing or by code inspection?
Trying a KVM<->TCG migration of an ARM guest will likely
hit the bug (because the number of coprocessor registers
on either end differs).
thanks
-- PMM
Alvise Rigo wrote:
> The method is not behaving in the way it's supposed to. It should return
> the new value only if it's less than the actual one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
See David patch of this function. There were a bug, we were doing the
wrong comparison. But we expect not to chang
On 25 February 2014 16:52, Alvise Rigo wrote:
> The method is not behaving in the way it's supposed to. It should return
> the new value only if it's less than the actual one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
This clashes with David Gilbert's patch to this function:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/pa
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:52:47PM +0100, Alvise Rigo wrote:
> The method is not behaving in the way it's supposed to. It should return
> the new value only if it's less than the actual one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
> ---
> vmstate.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 delet
The method is not behaving in the way it's supposed to. It should return
the new value only if it's less than the actual one.
Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
---
vmstate.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vmstate.c b/vmstate.c
index 284b080..038b274 100644
-
