On 03/24/2017 12:20 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 23.03.2017 um 16:35 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
>> On 03/23/2017 06:04 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 23.03.2017 um 15:17 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
On 03/23/2017 08:28 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> ZSDT compression algorithm consumes 3-5 tim
Am 23.03.2017 um 16:35 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> On 03/23/2017 06:04 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 23.03.2017 um 15:17 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> On 03/23/2017 08:28 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> >>> ZSDT compression algorithm consumes 3-5 times less CPU power with a
> >> s/ZSDT/ZSTD/
>
On 03/23/2017 06:04 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 23.03.2017 um 15:17 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> On 03/23/2017 08:28 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>> ZSDT compression algorithm consumes 3-5 times less CPU power with a
>> s/ZSDT/ZSTD/
>>
>>> comparable comression ratio with zlib. It would be wise to u
Am 23.03.2017 um 15:17 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 03/23/2017 08:28 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > ZSDT compression algorithm consumes 3-5 times less CPU power with a
>
> s/ZSDT/ZSTD/
>
> > comparable comression ratio with zlib. It would be wise to use it for
>
> s/comression/compression/
>
On 03/23/2017 08:28 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> ZSDT compression algorithm consumes 3-5 times less CPU power with a
s/ZSDT/ZSTD/
> comparable comression ratio with zlib. It would be wise to use it for
s/comression/compression/
> data compression f.e. for backups.
>
> The patch adds incompatibl
ZSDT compression algorithm consumes 3-5 times less CPU power with a
comparable comression ratio with zlib. It would be wise to use it for
data compression f.e. for backups.
The patch adds incompatible ZSDT feature into QCOW2 header that indicates
that compressed clusters must be decoded using ZSTD
