Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/13] Multiple fd migration support

2016-04-26 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > > * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> This patch series is "an" initial implementation of multiple fd migration. > >> This is to get something out for others to comment, it is not finished

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/13] Multiple fd migration support

2016-04-25 Thread Juan Quintela
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: >> Hi >> >> This patch series is "an" initial implementation of multiple fd migration. >> This is to get something out for others to comment, it is not finished at >> all. > > I've had a quick skim: > a) I think mst

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/13] Multiple fd migration support

2016-04-22 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi > > This patch series is "an" initial implementation of multiple fd migration. > This is to get something out for others to comment, it is not finished at all. I've had a quick skim: a) I think mst is right about the risk of getting stale pages

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/13] Multiple fd migration support

2016-04-20 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:44:28PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: > Hi > > This patch series is "an" initial implementation of multiple fd migration. > This is to get something out for others to comment, it is not finished at all. > > So far: > > - we create threads for each new fd > > - only for

[Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/13] Multiple fd migration support

2016-04-20 Thread Juan Quintela
Hi This patch series is "an" initial implementation of multiple fd migration. This is to get something out for others to comment, it is not finished at all. So far: - we create threads for each new fd - only for tcp of course, rest of transports are out of luck I need to integrate this with d