On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:06:37 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 27/04/2015 19:06, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> > Note that I'm running with -smp 1. My guess is that the iothread
> > is starved, since patch 472f4003 "Drop global lock during TCG code
> > execution"
> > removes from the iothread the abi
On 27/04/2015 19:06, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> Note that I'm running with -smp 1. My guess is that the iothread
> is starved, since patch 472f4003 "Drop global lock during TCG code execution"
> removes from the iothread the ability to kick CPU threads.
In theory that shouldn't be necessary anymore
Hi Emilio,
On 27/04/2015 19:06, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 14:26:14 +0200, Frederic Konrad wrote:
git clone g...@git.greensocs.com:fkonrad/mttcg.git -b multi_tcg_v4
I've tried to run buildroot's vexpress-a9 with this, but unfortunately
it gets stuck before showing
Hi Fred,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 14:26:14 +0200, Frederic Konrad wrote:
> git clone g...@git.greensocs.com:fkonrad/mttcg.git -b multi_tcg_v4
I've tried to run buildroot's vexpress-a9 with this, but unfortunately
it gets stuck before showing much progress towards boot:
[ messages in brackets are m
On 23/04/2015 17:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
Alex Bennée writes:
Frederic Konrad writes:
Does that makes sense?
BTW here is the repository:
git clone g...@git.greensocs.com:fkonrad/mttcg.git -b multi_tcg_v4
Is there a non-authenticated read-only http or git:// access to this repo?
I should
Alex Bennée writes:
> Frederic Konrad writes:
>
>>
>> Does that makes sense?
>>
>> BTW here is the repository:
>> git clone g...@git.greensocs.com:fkonrad/mttcg.git -b multi_tcg_v4
>
> Is there a non-authenticated read-only http or git:// access to this repo?
I should have done some poking fi
Frederic Konrad writes:
> On 10/04/2015 18:03, Frederic Konrad wrote:
>> On 30/03/2015 23:46, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 30 March 2015 at 07:52, Mark Burton
>>> wrote:
So - Fred is unwilling to send the patch set as it stands, because
frankly this part is totally broken.
On 22/04/2015 15:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 22 April 2015 at 13:26, Frederic Konrad wrote:
[re summary of design]
Does that makes sense?
Oops, I think that I lost that email in the flow of stuff through the
mailing list. I think Alex is going to be doing the bulk of the review
on this for Lin
On 22 April 2015 at 13:26, Frederic Konrad wrote:
[re summary of design]
> Does that makes sense?
Oops, I think that I lost that email in the flow of stuff through the
mailing list. I think Alex is going to be doing the bulk of the review
on this for Linaro, so I'll let him have a look at it :-)
On 10/04/2015 18:03, Frederic Konrad wrote:
On 30/03/2015 23:46, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 30 March 2015 at 07:52, Mark Burton
wrote:
So - Fred is unwilling to send the patch set as it stands, because
frankly this part is totally broken.
There is an independent patch set that needs splitting o
understood.
Cheers
Mark.
> On 30 Mar 2015, at 23:46, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 30 March 2015 at 07:52, Mark Burton wrote:
>> So - Fred is unwilling to send the patch set as it stands, because frankly
>> this part is totally broken.
>>
>> There is an independent patch set that needs splittin
On 30 March 2015 at 07:52, Mark Burton wrote:
> So - Fred is unwilling to send the patch set as it stands, because frankly
> this part is totally broken.
>
> There is an independent patch set that needs splitting out which deals with
> just the atomic instruction issue - specifically for ARM (th
to add some detail,
Unfortunately Fred is away this week, so we won’t get this patch set to you ask
quickly as I’d have liked.
We have a ‘working’ implementation - where ‘working’ is limited to a couple of
SMP cores, booting and running Dhrystone. The performance improvement we get is
close to
Hi,
Yes a v2 will come soon.
Actually I'm trying to unbreak GDB stub and a strange segfault with smp > 2.
Fred
On 27/03/2015 11:08, Alex Bennée wrote:
fred.kon...@greensocs.com writes:
From: KONRAD Frederic
Hi everybody,
This is the start of our work on TCG multithread.
It's been a while
fred.kon...@greensocs.com writes:
> From: KONRAD Frederic
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> This is the start of our work on TCG multithread.
It's been a while since the first RFC are we likely to see a v2 of the
patch series any time soon?
>
> We send it for comment to be sure we are taking the right dir
From: KONRAD Frederic
Hi everybody,
This is the start of our work on TCG multithread.
We send it for comment to be sure we are taking the right direction.
We already discussed the first patch but we keep it for simplicity.
We choice to keep a common tbs array for all VCPU but protect it with t
16 matches
Mail list logo
