* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Il 15/10/2014 17:59, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> > My idea here is that, if you don't use libvirt, you just start without
> > -S.
>
> If you don't use libvirt or any other QEMU management layer, you're not
> going to do migration except for debugging
Am 15.10.2014 um 09:55 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben:
> Hi
>
> by popular demand, and after too many time, this series. This is an
> RFC to know what people think about how to use them, the interface
> proposed, whatever.
> [...]
>
> Kevin: You asked for optional sections in the past for the blo
Il 15/10/2014 17:59, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> My idea here is that, if you don't use libvirt, you just start without
> -S.
If you don't use libvirt or any other QEMU management layer, you're not
going to do migration except for debugging purposes. There's just too
much state going on to be abl
On 10/15/2014 09:59 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Do we need a new monitor command that says to put the
>> guest into the same state that migration said it should be in (and the
>> command fails if migration was from an older source that did not send
>> the subsection)?
>
> I think that you don't n
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 01:55 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> by popular demand, and after too many time, this series. This is an
>> RFC to know what people think about how to use them, the interface
>> proposed, whatever.
>>
>> * simplify optional subsections moving the "needed"
On 10/15/2014 01:55 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>
> by popular demand, and after too many time, this series. This is an
> RFC to know what people think about how to use them, the interface
> proposed, whatever.
>
> * simplify optional subsections moving the "needed" function to
> vmstate des
Hi
by popular demand, and after too many time, this series. This is an
RFC to know what people think about how to use them, the interface
proposed, whatever.
* simplify optional subsections moving the "needed" function to
vmstate description. I think that this simplification makes sense
by
