On 29/07/2013 18:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 29/07/2013 17:27, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
On 18/07/2013 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with
icount.
We are w
Il 29/07/2013 17:27, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
> On 18/07/2013 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with
icount.
We are wondering if determinism
On 18/07/2013 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with icount.
We are wondering if determinism is really ensured with icount?
My opinion is that it *should* be det
On 18/07/2013 18:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/07/2013 18:31, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
On 18/07/2013 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with
icount.
We are
Il 18/07/2013 18:31, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
> On 18/07/2013 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with
icount.
We are wondering if determinism
On 18/07/2013 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with icount.
We are wondering if determinism is really ensured with icount?
My opinion is that it *should* be de
Il 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
>> As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with icount.
>> We are wondering if determinism is really ensured with icount?
>
> My opinion is that it *should* be deterministic but it would
> be unsu
On 18 July 2013 16:09, Frederic Konrad wrote:
> On 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
>>>
>>> As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with icount.
>>> We are wondering if determinism is really ensured with icount?
>>
>> My opinion is t
On 18/07/2013 17:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with icount.
We are wondering if determinism is really ensured with icount?
My opinion is that it *should* be deterministic but it would
be unsurprising if the
On 18 July 2013 16:02, wrote:
> As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with icount.
> We are wondering if determinism is really ensured with icount?
My opinion is that it *should* be deterministic but it would
be unsurprising if the determinism had got broken along the way.
From: KONRAD Frederic
Hi everybody,
As I said in the last email, we have issues with determinism with icount.
We are wondering if determinism is really ensured with icount?
We saw that the rt_clock is used at multiple place which is a pain for
replaying the simulation the same way. So we simply
11 matches
Mail list logo
