On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:23:08PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 03.04.2014 13:16, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 02/04/2014 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >>> Yes and I think this someone was you actually.
> >>> C
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:45:28PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 03.04.2014 10:46, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> > The name should be unique and we should clean up in both success and
> > failure (abort(3)) cases.
>
> The recipe for unique filenames elsewhere is mkstemp(), which I was
> planning
Am 03.04.2014 10:46, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> +{
>> +QTestState *s1, *s2;
>> +char *cmd;
>> +int ret;
>> +
>> +g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
>> +qtest_add_func("/ivshmem/n
Am 03.04.2014 13:16, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 02/04/2014 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>> Yes and I think this someone was you actually.
>>> Can something similar be done for this test?
>>>
>>
>> I think ivshmem depe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 02/04/2014 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >Yes and I think this someone was you actually.
> >Can something similar be done for this test?
> >
>
> I think ivshmem depends on ioeventfd, doesn't it? So short of
> implementi
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> +QTestState *s1, *s2;
> +char *cmd;
> +int ret;
> +
> +g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
> +qtest_add_func("/ivshmem/nop", nop);
> +
> +cmd = g_strdup_printf("-device ivs
Il 02/04/2014 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
Yes and I think this someone was you actually.
Can something similar be done for this test?
I think ivshmem depends on ioeventfd, doesn't it? So short of
implementing ioeventfd for TCG, no.
Paolo
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:07:09PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 02.04.2014 17:06, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Note that it launches two instances to as sharing memory is the purpose
> >> of Nahanni/ivshmem.
> >>
> >> Cc:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Note that it launches two instances to as sharing memory is the purpose
> of Nahanni/ivshmem.
>
> Cc: Cam Macdonell
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
> ---
> This test demonstrates a use case of running two QEMU instances in qtest.
Am 02.04.2014 17:06, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Note that it launches two instances to as sharing memory is the purpose
>> of Nahanni/ivshmem.
>>
>> Cc: Cam Macdonell
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
>> ---
>> This test demons
Note that it launches two instances to as sharing memory is the purpose
of Nahanni/ivshmem.
Cc: Cam Macdonell
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
---
This test demonstrates a use case of running two QEMU instances in qtest.
However, similar to mst's proposed KVM acpi-test, it fails on systems
with
11 matches
Mail list logo
