On 07/11/13 21:14, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 12:50 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> I'm sending this as an RFC because this is untested, and also because
>> I'm wondering if I'm seeing things after a long patch review session.
>
> I can't say that I tested it either, but...
>
>>
>> The probl
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:14:21 -0600
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 12:50 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > I'm sending this as an RFC because this is untested, and also because
> > I'm wondering if I'm seeing things after a long patch review session.
>
> I can't say that I tested it either, but..
On 07/11/2013 12:50 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> I'm sending this as an RFC because this is untested, and also because
> I'm wondering if I'm seeing things after a long patch review session.
I can't say that I tested it either, but...
>
> The problem is: in qmp-marshal.c, the dealloc visitor cal
I'm sending this as an RFC because this is untested, and also because
I'm wondering if I'm seeing things after a long patch review session.
The problem is: in qmp-marshal.c, the dealloc visitor calls use the
same errp pointer of the input visitor calls. This means that if
any of the input visitor
