Il 06/02/2013 19:37, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> I'll call these "full", "anchor", "unmap". Kevin pointed out to me that
>> you may need to control these at both the format and protocol levels,
>> which gives 9 possibilities. At the API level there is no problem
>> supporting all of them, but what
Am 06.02.2013 17:39, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> In order to finish the implementation of thin provisioning, we need to
> add a -drive option to describe how guest discard requests are mapped to
> host requests.
>
> We have three possibilities:
>
> - hide them and make them always succeed
> - transl
In order to finish the implementation of thin provisioning, we need to
add a -drive option to describe how guest discard requests are mapped to
host requests.
We have three possibilities:
- hide them and make them always succeed
- translate them to ANCHOR requests, i.e. mark the space as discarde
