Anup Patel writes:
> Hi All,
>
> How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
> desktop ?
>
> I know folks have already thought about this and probably also tried
> something or other on this front but, it will be good to know the downsides.
>
> Virtio-desktop can be a
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
> desktop ?
I have also thought about this, current virtio design is not very
clean. On the downside, pure no-legacy approach might not work well if
you want th
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Anup Patel wrote:
> On 24 January 2013 14:55, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>> > IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
>> > possible guest OSes can have support for it and d
On 24 January 2013 14:55, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
> > possible guest OSes can have support for it and different hypervisor can
> > emulate it without worrying abo
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> IMHO, If we have something like Virtio-desktop specification then all
> possible guest OSes can have support for it and different hypervisor can
> emulate it without worrying about guest support.
At this point x86 virtualization is matu
Hi All,
How about having a generic Virtio-based machine for emulating a virtual
desktop ?
I know folks have already thought about this and probably also tried
something or other on this front but, it will be good to know the downsides.
Virtio-desktop can be a separate specification describing a
