Am 11.09.2013 00:22, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 10 September 2013 23:04, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> busybox-static from Debian running on 32 bit Linux:
>>
>> $ alpha-linux-user/qemu-alpha -d in_asm
>> /usr/gnemul/qemu-alpha/bin/busybox pwd
>> host mmap_min_addr=0x1
>> Reserved 0x21e000 bytes of gu
On 10 September 2013 23:04, Stefan Weil wrote:
> busybox-static from Debian running on 32 bit Linux:
>
> $ alpha-linux-user/qemu-alpha -d in_asm
> /usr/gnemul/qemu-alpha/bin/busybox pwd
> host mmap_min_addr=0x1
> Reserved 0x21e000 bytes of guest address space
> Relocating guest address space f
Am 10.09.2013 23:52, schrieb Richard Henderson:
> On 09/10/2013 02:34 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> For native compilations, TCG_TARGET_CALL_ALIGN_ARGS can be set from
>> configure. Cross compilations cannot set that macro automatically
>> (or is there some way to do this?)
> I can't think of a way th
On 10 September 2013 22:34, Stefan Weil wrote:
> For native compilations, TCG_TARGET_CALL_ALIGN_ARGS can be set from
> configure.
> Cross compilations cannot set that macro automatically (or is there some
> way to
> do this?), so a configure option is needed if the cross target is unknown.
I thin
Am 23.08.2013 23:18, schrieb Richard Henderson:
> I don't see how TCI really comes into this except as Yet Another Backend to be
> tested. Indeed, such unit testing could show that TCI is in fact broken wrt
> helpers, depending on the host abi.
>
> E.g. tci never defines TCG_TARGET_CALL_ALIGN_ARGS
On 09/10/2013 02:34 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> For native compilations, TCG_TARGET_CALL_ALIGN_ARGS can be set from
> configure. Cross compilations cannot set that macro automatically
> (or is there some way to do this?)
I can't think of a way that would be reasonable from configure.
> Should we us
