On 06/03/2012 06:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 June 2012 23:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2012 04:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
I think the previous freeze was a bit long, mainly the problem is how
to handle merging of different development trees (QOM vs. PPC for
example). So 2,5 weeks cou
On 2 June 2012 23:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 04:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> I think the previous freeze was a bit long, mainly the problem is how
>> to handle merging of different development trees (QOM vs. PPC for
>> example). So 2,5 weeks could be nice.
>
> Yes, I feel it was a l
On 06/03/2012 04:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Summary: GA on September 1st, shorten feature freeze to 2.5 weeks.
We've discussed a lot in the past moving to a quarterly release cycle. More
frequent releases will allow distributions to more ea
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Summary: GA on September 1st, shorten feature freeze to 2.5 weeks.
>
> We've discussed a lot in the past moving to a quarterly release cycle. More
> frequent releases will allow distributions to more easily ship newer
> versions of QEMU.
I
Summary: GA on September 1st, shorten feature freeze to 2.5 weeks.
We've discussed a lot in the past moving to a quarterly release cycle. More
frequent releases will allow distributions to more easily ship newer versions of
QEMU.
Here's the schedule (also available on the wiki):
http://wiki
