On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:22:15 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31:43AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300
> > Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > > On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz
> > >
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31:43AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino
> > > wrote:
> > > > This function should be used when the VM is not
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:41:48 +0300
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Luiz Capitulino
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:04:58 +0200
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> On 2011-07-28 20:00, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:52:31 +0200
> >> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:04:58 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2011-07-28 20:00, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:52:31 +0200
>> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2011-07-28 19:48, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> >>> On Thu, 2
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:22:52PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:04:58 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> > On 2011-07-28 20:00, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:52:31 +0200
> > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 2011-07-28 19:48, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:04:58 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-07-28 20:00, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:52:31 +0200
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> On 2011-07-28 19:48, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:39:23 -0300
> >>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
On 2011-07-28 20:00, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:52:31 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2011-07-28 19:48, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:39:23 -0300
>>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:20:41 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> O
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:52:31 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-07-28 19:48, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:39:23 -0300
> > Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:20:41 +0200
> >> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2011-07-28 17:18, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
On 2011-07-28 19:48, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:39:23 -0300
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:20:41 +0200
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> On 2011-07-28 17:18, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:19 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:39:23 -0300
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:20:41 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> > On 2011-07-28 17:18, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:19 +0200
> > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 2011-07-28 15:37, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >>> On
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:20:41 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-07-28 17:18, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:19 +0200
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> On 2011-07-28 15:37, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> On 07/28/2011 04:31 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:2
On 2011-07-28 17:18, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:19 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2011-07-28 15:37, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2011 04:31 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, B
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:19 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-07-28 15:37, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/28/2011 04:31 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300
> >> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 a
On 2011-07-28 15:37, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 04:31 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> > On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz
>> Capitulino wrote:
>> > > > This function sho
On 07/28/2011 04:31 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino
wrote:
> > > This function should be used when the VM is not supposed to resume
> > >
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:23:22 +0300
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino
> > wrote:
> > > This function should be used when the VM is not supposed to resume
> > > execution (eg. by issuing 'cont' monitor command).
>
On 07/28/2011 12:44 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> This function should be used when the VM is not supposed to resume
> execution (eg. by issuing 'cont' monitor command).
>
> Today, we allow the user to resume execution even when:
>
>o the
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> This function should be used when the VM is not supposed to resume
> execution (eg. by issuing 'cont' monitor command).
>
> Today, we allow the user to resume execution even when:
>
> o the guest shuts down and -no-shutdown is used
> o th
This function should be used when the VM is not supposed to resume
execution (eg. by issuing 'cont' monitor command).
Today, we allow the user to resume execution even when:
o the guest shuts down and -no-shutdown is used
o there's a kvm internal error
o loading the VM state with -loadvm or "l
19 matches
Mail list logo