On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:59:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >>If the only argument for adding GGI is so that you don't have to install
> >>libsdl, then does that mean that we should have an X11, fbdev, etc.
> >>backend for people who don't have GG
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
If the only argument for adding GGI is so that you don't have to install
libsdl, then does that mean that we should have an X11, fbdev, etc.
backend for people who don't have GGI installed?
I think a GGI back-end would be useful.
I wouldn't mind also hav
Hi,
On 02/10/2007, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:09:41PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:45:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> What does one
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:09:41PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:45:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer to
this.
GGI su
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:45:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer
to this.
GGI supports a number of display-targets:
http://www.ggi-project.org/targets.h
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:09:41PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:45:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer to
>>> this.
>>>
>>
>> GGI supports a number of display-
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer to
> this.
GGI has backends that SDL does not have.
Hth,
Dscho
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:45:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer
to this.
GGI supports a number of display-targets:
http://www.ggi-project.org/targets.html
umong them X11,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:29:51PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 07:36:47PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>>- What is the deal with the GGI license mentioned?
>
>I don't really know. The current patch has
>+/* #include license.bsd */
>But if this imposes a problem due to th
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:45:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer to
this.
GGI supports a number of display-targets:
http://www.ggi-project.org/targets.html
umong them X11, quartz, directx, fbdev
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 07:36:47PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> If i need to make changes to get it accepted, please let me know.
>
>- The have_gcc3_options addition to configure looks suspicious.
Looks like a leftover, yes. Removed.
>- The softfloat.h/system.h workaro
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:45:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer to
> this.
GGI supports a number of display-targets:
http://www.ggi-project.org/targets.html
umong them X11, quartz, directx, fbdev, vgl, vnc, wsfb, libaa,
termin
What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer to this.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:02:23PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
If someone prefers patches in another f
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:02:23PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >
> >> If someone prefers patches in another form or access to my git
> >> repository, let me know and I'll be happy to provide that.
> >
> >W
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:32:20PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>Hi,
>FWIW I would have preferred you following my simple instructions to set up
>a fork, but what the heck.
ermz, sorry. Thanks :)
>
>Anybody who fetches the "ggi" branch from my repository on repo.or.cz:
>this branch will be
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:02:23PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >
> >> If someone prefers patches in another form or access to my git
> >> repository, let me know and I'll be happy to provi
Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been working an a CRISv32 target port of Qemu. The linux-user
> emulation is quite functional but the system emulation is still
> very limited.
Impressive work!
> I've tested the user emulation with a test-suite added to the tests/
> dir in Qemu. I also
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:02:23PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>
>> If someone prefers patches in another form or access to my git
>> repository, let me know and I'll be happy to provide that.
>
>Why not add a fork on http://repo.or.cz/w/q
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:02:23PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>
> > If someone prefers patches in another form or access to my git
> > repository, let me know and I'll be happy to provide that.
>
> Why not add a fork on http://repo.o
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> If someone prefers patches in another form or access to my git
> repository, let me know and I'll be happy to provide that.
Why not add a fork on http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu.git/? It's easy: just
click on the "fork" link, fill out a small form,
Hello,
I've been working an a CRISv32 target port of Qemu. The linux-user emulation is
quite functional but the system emulation is still very limited.
I've tested the user emulation with a test-suite added to the tests/ dir in
Qemu. I also used GCC's c torture tests from the CRIS GCC port base
21 matches
Mail list logo
